Jensen Huang Confirms: NVIDIA and TSMC Have Done Business for Nearly 30 Years Without a Legal Contract | Trust Is the Most Valuable Moat

Source: the full Dwarkesh Patel Podcast interview “Jensen Huang – Will Nvidia’s moat persist?” (YouTube). Quotes are lightly edited from the English audio and used for commentary only.

This short got nearly 80,000 plays on Facebook, the most of any “foreign figure interview” short I’ve made.

The conclusion in three sentences:

• Jensen Huang said it himself: NVIDIA has done business with TSMC for nearly 30 years, and there’s no legal contract between them.
• He isn’t saying “we got lucky” — he treats “doing what you say and not raising prices when demand spikes” as an NVIDIA operating principle.
• For Taiwanese people, this kind of trust is leverage in itself. The “sacred mountain protecting the nation” isn’t a slogan; it’s what the biggest customer says out loud.

What exactly did Jensen Huang say?

It came up when the interview turned to how NVIDIA sets prices. The host noted that other chip companies raise prices when demand is high. Huang’s answer:

“If I quoted you a price, that’s it. And if demand goes through the roof, so be it.”

The host followed up: that’s why you have such a productive relationship with TSMC?

“Yeah. I’ve been doing business with them, I guess, coming up on 30 years. And NVIDIA and TSMC don’t have a legal contract. There is always some rough justice. Sometimes I’m right, sometimes I’m wrong. Sometimes I got a better deal, sometimes I got a worse deal. But overall, in the whole, the relationship is incredible. I can completely trust them.”

He added that this is one of the things you can count on NVIDIA for.

Three things I took from this

1. Trust comes from long-term repetition, not one negotiation

“Sometimes I got a better deal, sometimes a worse deal” — that line is key.

The two companies don’t come out ahead every single time, but both know this is a repeated game that’s lasted 30 years. Losing a round doesn’t matter, because over the long run both sides win. A contract protects you “when there’s no trust”; when trust runs deep enough, the contract becomes an unnecessary cost.

2. “Not raising prices opportunistically” is itself a moat

Before talking about TSMC, Huang talked about NVIDIA: “If I quoted you a price, that’s it; even if demand goes through the roof.”

Many people think a moat means technology or patents. But in this passage, the moat is “you don’t need to second-guess me.” Customers don’t need to compare prices, negotiate or guard against you every time — and those savings are very hard for competitors to copy.

3. Taiwan’s leverage isn’t just capacity

We often call TSMC Taiwan’s “sacred mountain,” usually meaning its process technology, yield and capacity.

But the world’s biggest AI chip customer publicly says “I can completely trust them.” That kind of trust takes decades of doing what you said, again and again, to build — and it’s harder to move than any factory.

What does this have to do with the rest of us?

What I take from it is a simple reminder: in work and life, as in investing, the most valuable things are the ones that compound.

Compounding doesn’t only happen with money. Each time you keep your word, people doubt you a little less next time; after thirty years, you might not even need a contract.

FAQ

The short video

Further reading

Lazy conclusion

懶大

金融科技新創 CEO | 獨立財務顧問

1. Jensen Huang confirmed it: NVIDIA and TSMC have done business for nearly 30 years without a legal contract
2. Trust is the result of a repeated game: sometimes you lose, sometimes you win, and overall both sides gain
3. Keeping your word is a moat: “if I quoted you a price, that’s it” — customers don’t need to guard against you
4. Taiwan’s leverage: not just capacity, but decades of accumulated trust

The most valuable things are the ones that compound.

📩

訂閱電子報，獲取更多理財觀點

立即訂閱

🔒 免費訂閱，隨時可退訂

Sources

• Dwarkesh Patel Podcast: “Jensen Huang – Will Nvidia’s moat persist?” (YouTube, video id Hrbq66XqtCo), passage on pricing and the TSMC partnership

This post is interview commentary and personal opinion. It is not investment advice.